BOXFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN


Photo: Steve Hood

LATEST NEWS

THE 2020 PLANS FOR NEW PLANNING PERMISSION LAWS IN FULL

07 August 2020

The 2020 plans for new planning permission laws in full

LOCAL PLANS

What are they proposing?
Under the new reforms, every local authority will have a local plan that sets clear rules for development. These will invite residents and politicians to get involved at the planning stage, with little or no say over individual developments once those plans are in place. After that, new buildings will have to meet a single "sustainable development" test that replaces existing assessments on local impact on the environment and viability.


...read more


NEW GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER

06 August 2020

NEW GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER

Government White Paper proposes to scrap current planning rules and allow developers to assume the right to develop on large swathes of countryside with no right for us to object.

"Race to the bottom: reform to planning system in England could be catastrophic"
Government’s dramatic building reforms likely to cut democratic input into the planning process by half.

READ ARTICLE ON THE GUARDIAN WEBSITE

CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CONSULTATION


...read more


CATESBY WINS PERMISSION TO BUILD 64 HOUSES OFF SAND HILL DESPITE VIGOROUS OBJECTIONS FROM THE VILLAGE

16 June 2020

Catesby wins permission to build 64 houses off Sand Hill despite vigorous objections from the village

Boxford Society's Response:

As I am sure you all know by now but on 17th June 2020, Babergh's Planning Committee approved Outline Planning Permission for 64 houses on Sand Hill.

Andrew Good, on behalf of the Boxford Society, Roger Loose, on behalf of the Parish Council and Bryn Hurren our District Councillor put up a valiant fight against this proposal – quite difficult in the 3 minutes allocated to them. However, various factors worked against them.

The meeting was a virtual one with everyone in their own bubble. This led to a rather fractured meeting as everyone wrestled with the technology and this format did not lead to any meaningful discussion of the application itself. Most of the Committee seemed reluctant to approve – in fact no-one was even prepared to second the motion so the Chairman had to do this - they were perhaps fearful of the repercussions of rejection as Babergh has recently had to pay for two successful planning appeals that went against them.

The significant objection by Babergh's own Policy Planning Officer, which was included in the report, had obviously not been read by any of the Committee and when the Case Officer was asked to comment replied that 'policy matters are a matter of balance' and no further discussion ensued.


...read more